18 May 2024

How to Leave the Country if (X) Wins

As we lead up to the election, we repeatedly hear, "If (fill in the blank) wins, I'm leaving the country". Okay, good for you, but I have a few suggestions as someone who said that and then did it. What follows is an update from this same advice from 2016, when the choice was stark, but not as frightening in the potential outcome. It is that time again; the US election cycle is heating up, and like good brewing beer, the scum is rising to the top. Unlike good beer brewing, the scum is not being scraped off and discarded, hosed away into the metaphorical gutters of history, yet. 


(This is written primarily for Amerikans, but with elections coming up in so many countries this year and in the UK next year, this applies to any of them; just change anything US-specific to your own country)

 

The world has changed since I wrote the first version of this in 2016. Then, the world was a “happier” place, with an international order and reasonable peace and cooperation. Climate Change was happening, but the hot summers had not yet become the “fire season”. Europe had seen the back of its worst crisis (Greece) and had yet to enter its next crisis (Brexit). More importantly, Europe was not on the cusp of WWIII, and Ukraine looked more and more like a future EU member state. In the US of Amerika, the "War on Women" rages along with the "War on Anyone Not a White Male".

 

Back then, no one even thought to ask a candidate, “Will you accept the outcome of the election?” Neither candidate was accused of #TRE45ON, and neither was facing 88 felony charges for attempting to overthrow the government. Policy was the primary reason for disagreement, not fear that Lincoln’s admonishment would be disregarded by his own party: “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” For all its faults, by 2016, the United States continued to demonstrate that it was possible to transfer government between losers and victors peacefully and with decorum. 

 

In 2016, then people said “If X is elected, I’m leaving the country” it was more out of petulance than actual fear of potential persecution if they stayed. Today the sentiment is out of fear, be it for reproductive freedom, personal freedom, economic choice, gender and racial equality, and fear of a potential fascist dictatorial state enabled by a corrupt Supreme Court and corrupted executive branch of government.  

 

For others, there is a fear of taxes and a diminishing of their wealth or their dreams of wealth. Even the most prosaic concerns about the cost of living in the US and a desire to live their lives in lower-cost countries (though this driver for moving is constant and not a potential outcome of the coming election). 

 

You’ve made up your mind; it is time to go. What is my advice, having “gone” before, multiple times? 

 

First, if only it could be easy. There is work to manage, property to find and (rent or buy), and attempting to find a way to economically survive post a move. And of course, the move needed to be legal, or there would be no difference between you and an economic migrant trying to sneak into Europe by boat.  

 

For those of you who really mean it, let me give just a few suggestions based on having done it.  

 

First, if you have already identified your future country of residence, then some of this will not matter. For example, if you have already identified Mexico, Ecuador, or somewhere else as your future home, then you can skip section 3 below about selecting the location. 

 

1. Make the personal commitment. Talk to yourself, your spouse, family. Make sure that everyone is, if not supportive, then understanding. But also test yourself - am I just saying this, or do I really, really mean it? Look around. Are you genuinely ready to leave your community, friends, and the things you've been doing and taking for granted? If so, read on.

  

2. Plan. Long in advance. Get as much ready and thought-out as you can. Depending on who wins, you may be at the back of a very long queue of people who feel the same way, so start NOW. There may not be a million economic or political refugees streaming north and south across American borders into countries with makeshift refugee camps, but there will be queues to speak to someone at a consulate or embassy, delays for passports and visas, and limited jobs already being taken by those in front of you.  

 

Know also that you will be required to provide copious amounts of documentation. Unless you are one of the very many Americans with parents or grandparents from another country, you probably will not qualify for automatic residence or citizenship. Be prepared to source copies of your birth certificate, marriage certificate, education documentation, health records or a medical assessment. In most cases, all these documents must be apostilled and not more than three months old at the time of submission. 

  

3. Where? Not such an easy question. Canada; well, maybe. But the real question is; where in the world will I feel at home, has what I need in infrastructure, and is politically acceptable to me (after all, you will be leaving because of a politically unacceptable outcome). One rule-of-thumb is that you are NOT going on holiday, so if you've been somewhere on holiday and said, "I could live here", you probably either cannot or would not want to year-round.  

  

So, what are your criteria? May I suggest the following:  

  

A. Language: how important is language to you, or do you speak a second language, which will certainly help narrow down your choices. Learning a language is not easy, but is possible and can be huge fun. It can also be a huge hindrance to getting things done and enjoying yourself. Some countries have a very large population of people who speak English as a second language. Countries that rely on tourism also tend to have high rates of fluency in English.  

  

B. Political System: Are you happy with a totalitarian regime as long as they don't bother the foreigners, or do you demand a democratically elected government? Some very nice places are ruled by dictators or monarchs yet are full of opportunity and fabulous people. Remember that you have NO say in that country, so be ready to leave your political opinions in the US when you leave. In fact, in some countries, it is illegal even to speak ill of the country. 

  

C. Economy: If you are going to "retire" then the choices are much wider, but if you will need to work, you might want to consider developed economies. Associated with this is your ability to get a work visa or other authorization to earn a living in the country. Do not assume you can work "under the table" unless you are a true "digital nomad".  

 

Of course, some countries are more "open" than others, and it does help to have a second citizenship. And by open, let’s call a cat, a cat: I mean corrupt. In many countries there are two prices; cash and card (or any official bank transfers). There are also differing levels and types of corruption. In some countries, you always have a $20 bill on you, as that is the standard “donation” that is expected by the police. In others, be ready to say “I’ll pay cash” and see if that changes the price. But know in advance what is expected. Offering a $20 donation in New Zealand will get you arrested. Saying you’ll pay cash in Greece might get you a better price. "Is there a police charity" works well in Panama.

  

D. Civil Stability: Some countries have a higher potential (or current) for civil war, social unrest, or outright war with a neighbour. How safe do you want to feel? In some countries, the overt oppression of minorities creates an environment of almost continual latent violence, covered over by a patina of civility and culture. And you can forget your guns. In almost all countries, guns cannot be brought into the countries in your personal effects that you ship, and ownership of guns is either prohibited or very difficult to obtain. For example, Panama allows private gun ownership with a permit (but you cannot bring your guns into the country), but in three years, we heard only about people who had applied for a permit but had not been granted one after waiting multiple years.

  

E. Population Density: Hey, we all want to be in the countryside, right? But realistically, most people live in cities, and some very attractive countries are effectively city-states. Remember also that Islands are wonderful, with beaches (most) and sunshine (many) but they are islands, and if you will suffer from "island fever" (a need to escape the island periodically, just for sanity’s sake). That applies to almost all islands, from the UK down to Singapore.  

  

F. Climate: If you want to ski and like winter, then Dubai probably isn't for you. Likewise, escaping winter seems to be a huge draw. Florida isn't full of New Yorkers who cannot get enough snow. I like some seasons, but not too hot or much cold. More importantly, my wife loathes the cold, which is a major factor.  

 

And do not forget longer-term climate and sea level rise. Do you really want to invest in a seaside villa in a flat river delta? Sure, you might not be consistently flooded out in the next decade, but in a couple of decades, your seaside property will be “underwater” in value (also a consideration if you are interested in an island retreat). The same consideration applies to potential temperature changes over the coming decades. 

  

G. Distance: Never forget the tyranny of distance. If you need to be close to family and friends, then consider just how far you are willing to be, and how long it will take you to get "home" if that is what you will still call it. New Zealand may be heaven on earth, but it is 24 - 36 elapsed hours of travel from North America or Europe, meaning visitors effectively need to dedicate two weeks to make the trip worthwhile, and so will you be going "home" for a visit.  

 

H. Legality of your Move: Remember that different countries have different visa requirements. Some countries (like Panama and Mexico) have “Friendly Nation” visas and “Jubilado” or “retiree” visas, requiring only proof of a monthly pension of a certain value. Other countries allow “Investor” visas. Still others have “Golden Visas” that require a minimum level of investment, usually in property that you will live in. 

 

Finally, you may have additional criteria of your own. Food, wine, sunshine, opportunities to work in IT, Risk, Accounting, Oil & Gas, etc. If you life for French food, don't even consider moving to the UK.  

  

4. Meet the Natives. Well, at least meet people from that country. Hear from them the pluses and minuses, and ask them why they do not live there. Your assumptions about a place will be reinforced or corrected by getting to know people - the kind of people that will be around you every day. These people will also provide you with great pointers on how to settle in, and may have good in-country contact who can help. Their networks will be invaluable to you.  

 

Better yet, do you already know people living there, friends from years past, work colleagues? When you arrive, you will want to tap into a network to help with the mundane and the complex. Having a network already in place will smooth the process. Getting electricity and gas, or water services turned on or registered in your name. Phone contracts, etc. While you may be able to do all of these, having help certainly will make any move smoother. There are relocation services that can help for a fee in most countries. 

  

5. Visit. So you've picked a few places (or only one), met and talked with people from there, now it is time to make your knowledge a bit more real; go there. Spend a week or two or more. Do not look at it as a tourist; look at it as a resident. What do the supermarkets look like? Is there a good selection of the foods that are important to you, and at prices that you can afford? Forget American brands; look for local or regional equivalents or just commit to enjoying what is available locally.


Talk to local headhunters (if you are in an easily transportable profession). Walk through neighbourhoods that you will be able to afford to live in. You can rely on the fact that it will not look like the brochures and holiday snaps. You will get a sense of how nervous you feel (or not), the level of pollution and waste, and the friendliness (or otherwise) of locals as you wander around, have a coffee, and stop in stores. 

  


You are now about as ready as you ever will be, and all that remains is for you to watch the November night results.  

  

Of course, there is the risk that after doing all your prep, you may reach the conclusion that it doesn't really matter who wins; it is time to go anyway. In which case, I hope the list above helps you with your planning and eventual move. 

  

20 March 2024

What does Gaza mean for the Democrats in November?

Elections are won by who comes out to vote and who stays home and by which side has the money to spend on advertising and access. The Democrats have the deeper pockets by far at the moment, so they will be able to flood the airwaves.


But the other side may become problematic. When voters simply cannot stomach a candidate or policies but equally will never vote for the other party, they elect to stay home. And they stay home because they say, “Not in my name.”  


Gaza may become such an issue for Biden and the Democrats. He is setting the policy, and his administration is being seen to support Israel no matter what. Stern diplomatic words do not mean anything to the voters because they are diplomatic words, words designed to convey desired changes in other countries' policies or practices. Rarely do governments say, “Do this or else”. There is an implied “or else” associated with the diplomatic words, but too often we have seen the US fail to follow through on the “or else" (also known as “Red Lines”). 

 

In Syria, the US made it clear through diplomatic speak that the use of chemical weapons would be a red line. Assad ignored Obama, and Obama did nothing material or materially visible to the public in response. The US said what their red line was, and it was ignored. 

 

The US is in that situation with Netanyahu and Israel now. The diplomatic speak is telling Israel to back off, to protect civilians, and to let aid flow. But Netanyahu and the Israeli state and military are ignoring Biden. They know they can. Biden must respond strongly. 

 

Sanctions against a handful of the vilest settlers is a start, but it is window dressing. Highly visible but meaningless in terms of engendering actual change in Israeli policy. Too little, potentially too late, and with virtually no chance of creating any meaningful change. 

 

What Gaza does not have is time. What Biden does not have is time. There would seem to be a golden opportunity to do something meaningful, and not to present the Democratic Party and Biden as stooges for Netanyahu. People are dying. They are starving. Soon there will be pictures of Palestinian children with distended bellies, glassy eyes, and mothers too weak to hold them. 

 

When those photos go viral, and they will, either Biden responds meaningfully, or the consequences could be highly damaging in November.  

 

“But Trump is worse” is not a valid response to this crisis. Trump only needs to keep his mouth shut on Israel and he comes across as the lesser problem. But he won't keep his mouth shut. He will say in classic Trumpingly fashion “Only I can solve this". And he will follow that up with “When I’m President, the war will be over in 24 hours." And there will be people who will believe him. 

 

Some Democrats will believe him—not because he has any diplomatic skills, but precisely because he does not. He will say, “No more aid,” and Israel will listen. It is pretty obvious that a Bull in a China shop is what is needed right now, and Trump certainly fits that bill. (realistically Trump will do nothing except look for how he can have his pockets lined out of this.)

 

Biden does not have the time for diplomatic niceties. Whatever he does needs to be done soon enough to push the crisis from the front page, and that will require the bombs to stop falling and the tanks (and soldiers) to stop shooting.  

 

The sooner this happens, the sooner the voters can worry about other issues.  

 

I don't know how long, scientifically, it will take for people to allow Gaza to fade into the background. But someone does know. They know exactly how long it takes for messaging to change minds. And they should be working on this right now (as I expect they are). They also will know what it will really take to change the script, and that will be more than Israel will be willing to accept. 

 

Chuck Schumer's call for fresh elections in Israel is an indication of just how seriously some Democrats are taking this. For the ranking Jewish Senator to make that statement in complete defiance of diplomatic norms should demonstrate just how serious the situation is, and their understanding of the damage that is being caused. 

 

Here I'm talking about Amerikan voters, not the global community. And I'm not talking about the Palestinians in Gaza because they do not get to vote, anywhere. But because for Democrats (and Republicans), it is only the American voter that matters in this. Democrats need voters to come to the polls. Republicans gleefully hope that Democrats will stay home, saying to themselves, “Not in my name”. And anyone who thinks that won't happen is kidding themselves.  

 

Biden is running out of time.  

 

He needs to response, and respond big, and do it now. 

 

What could be done? He could announce that the US will deliver aid to south and north Gaza, trucks and convoys flying the American flag. He could announce that the US is investigating some number of situations and individuals for potential war crimes, including senior unnamed members of the Israeli government. 

 

There are many other things he could do. 

 

He is running out of time.