Ever since the GFC (Global Financial Crisis) of 2008 - present, there has been a constant refrain that "no one saw this coming". That is rubbish of course.
as rubbish as the idea that somehow we either are out of the crisis, or
we will soon be in the clear. All that has happened is that national
governments have continued to kick the can further down the road,
playing loan-shark to themselves and to each other. Greece is only one
example of the fate of virtually all developed countries.
Why, and what is coming?
Why. As a matter of principle, marketing exists as a discipline
specifically to convince people to buy something (a tangible product or
an idea) that may or may not actually be good for them, but the selling
of which will delivery greater benefit to the seller. As a second matter
of principle, wealth is invested with purpose of gaining a greater
return on the wealth invested, at a return greater than the passive
"parking" of that wealth in non-productive assets. Or, in simpler terms,
money wants to gather more money. Or, even cruder, the Rich want to get
Richer, happily at the expense of either other Rich, or at the expense
of everyone else.
So, consider the investment in
renting politicians and pundits as marketing spend, with the objective
selling the idea (which is the product) that the amassing of wealth is
both possible for anyone, and that any breaks on the amassing of wealth
is a tax on the aspirations of those that are not wealthy. From this
lens it is easy to accept union busting as a valid exercise, as unions
by their nature act as blocks on the concentration of wealth.
economic crashes serve to undermine the increase in wealth. Therefore,
it is advantageous for markets to either be reasonably stable, or to
increase in value. As the wealth in markets is concentrate in the
share-owning class(es), then the increase the value of markets defacto
increases the wealth of the owners.
Debt as a venture capitalist tool
is a great way to amass wealth? How about increasing a company's debt
burden through the sale of bonds, and then spend a portion of that debt
to "buy back" shares or pay dividends. In both cases, wealth is
concentrated in the hands of the owners, while the risk and eventual
debt burden is passed to the company and the owners of the bonds who
carry a risk of default by a failing company.
then this same tactic at national scales. The creation of new money
through QE (Quantitative Easing) serves a similar function as the
issuing of company debt. The national debt is increased, interest rates
are suppressed, and there are limited places that "money can go" to make
a return. So where does the money go? To the markets, which continue to
rise on a tide of new debt. And as with the company debt, while the
"dividends" in the form of increased value of the markets are
concentrated, the risk is diffused across the entire population - the
national "bond holders" in effect. Individual gain (the markets)
balanced against socialized pain (the national debt).
all, as the wealth is concentrated in the markets (or more accurately,
in the wallets of the shareholders) the nation(s) find that the money
they could have either not spent, or spent for the good of the nation,
is wasted through debt repayments and reduced national investment.
this way the venture capitalist playbook of pumping up company debt,
shifting the value from the company to the shareholders, and leaving the
company and bond holders with the risk and reduced returns, is
translated into national policy.
So wheres the problem?
the company must either pay back that debt, or go bankrupt. Paying that
debt adds to the overall costs of the company, reducing the future
potential returns. As John Mauldin in his February 24th "Thoughts from the Front Line"
newsletter says "Debt is Future Consumption Denied". And that future
consumption denied is as true at a company as at a national level.
here's the problem, and the future. Governments such as Japan have
proved that you can continue to produce new money for an almost infinite
period of time (or for decades at least) without actually collapsing
your economy. And if Japan can get away with it, certainly the United
State, the UK, Europe, or almost any other government can accomplish the
same scam, keeping markets afloat and continuing to concentrate wealth
while diffusing the risk, and the resulting burden.
governments do not act in a void. And when all government are playing
the same game, eventually there is no one left to buy their debt but
themselves, from themselves.
Exist from QE cannot
happen, because to do so will mean that the existing stock of financial
capacity will be required to start paying off those corporate (oops,
national) bonds. And borrowing money from yourself only works if the
only person you are paying is yourself.
The next crisis, the real one
writers have been predicting that 2012, 2013, 2015, 201x will be the
year that Japan effectively goes under. I don't know when it will
happen, but it will.
Greece, currently under the thumb
of the loan sharks of the Troika, will "file for bankruptcy" and leave
the Euro. That is a given. When? I don't know, but my prediction is May
2015, through a weekend of new laws on the creation of the New Drachma.
The playbook already exists, and Varoufakis's (the Greek Finance
Minister) goal with the extension is not to actually capitulate to
Berlin and Brussels, but to manage the Grexit to Syrisa's schedule, not
to be forced into an exist at with Berlin and Brussels in control.
is the future, so watch it closely. It is the future of the West (and
much of the East). As ugly as the Grexit will be, Greece will be back,
and in a few years it will actually be a growing, vibrant economy again.
Greeks will come home.
The rest of the central bankers
will cower in fear of the lynch mobs and continue to pump money, while
the wealthy continue to rent politician and marketeers to sell the
concept of perpetual aspiration. Money will continue to be printed. But
national investment will falter, fear will continue to stalk the land,
and the wealth will continue to trust in the gated community and private
The moment central banks attempt to raise
rates, the markets will collapse, therefore interest rates will be
artificially held down. Raise rates and governments will need to spend
more of their limited budgets on interest payments, taking budget from
other national spending priorities, or increasing borrowing (against
themselves again). Yet to admit that they cannot raise rates will
confirm the trap that the banks are stuck in. So they will continue to
hint, and might even, once, raise rates, only a little, before dropping
The debt bubble will burst, and massive
wealth will be destroyed, and the suffering will be terrible. For five
or even ten years.
And yes, we'll have years of people
writing that we could not have predicted this, and that no one saw it
coming. And that is, and will be rubbish.
But the sun will come out again.